I think an important distinction in this discussion is that MakeICT is not a traditional pottery studio business. It’s a nonprofit makerspace built around shared community access, volunteering, and member participation across many areas — not just ceramics. Comparing it directly to commercial pottery studios that charge firing fees, class fees, and operate as for-profit businesses does not feel like a one-to-one comparison. We already contribute through memberships, volunteering, donations, and community involvement.
I also agree with the point that was raised about volunteer tasks and improving awareness of what needs attention in the studio. Honestly, this was the first time I had seen such a complete list of routine tasks, and I think that highlights part of the issue — newer or less involved members may genuinely not know all the ways they can help.
I think clearer instructions, organization, and communication around volunteering could go a long way. For example, reclaim and the pug mill are often discussed as major tasks, but many members may not know how to get involved, who to ask, what training is needed, or what the actual process looks like. Having documented responsibilities, volunteer signups, quick training sessions, or even simple “here’s how you can help today” guidance could make it much easier for people to contribute. Even small things like emptying buckets, wiping down wheels and stools, mopping floors, cleaning ware boards and shelves, organizing tools and bats, washing towels, and generally noticing what needs attention all help reduce the burden on the smaller group of volunteers currently carrying much of the workload.
Personally, I’d rather see us strengthen volunteer participation, accountability, communication, and community engagement first before moving toward adding firing fees. Accessibility is one of the things that makes MakeICT valuable, especially for newer potters, hobbyists, and people who may not be able to afford traditional studio pricing.