Perhaps instead of Specialized Committee we should call them…? Maybe Working Committee or Project Committee or just Special Committee. I dunno, I can’t think of something better, and I don’t like any of them. LOL
Specialized Committee Formation, no. 4, is repeated as f.9 later in the document. Maybe just a copy-paste error.
It seems as if some of the list structure of the document is messed up, which makes it a bit unclear if the whole document (ie the sections titled Committee Leadership and Committee Responsibilities and Rules) from Specialized Committee Formation down applies only to Specialized Committees or to ALL committees because of the formatting of the document since the numbering is unclear. The sections should be numbered, and the subordinate numbering should be checked and fixed.
Specialized Committee Formation / 1 - Add something like: “The board may approve, modify and approve, or deny the request to form the committee. If approved, the board may assign physical space or other assets, equipment, and a budget to the newly formed committee as it sees fit.” Sure it’s implied this would happen, but that just leaves room to argue.
I believe current process may require some oversight / approval for area ‘access policies’ to ensure they conform to MakeICT policies / procedures / and standing rules. How does that work here? At least this was the case when we revised the wiki a year or so ago. Maybe this changed, or it died when we lost our Makerspace Director.
Special Committee Dissolution - physical assets “can be claimed” sounds problematic given how much we like to argue about things. I would suggest something like “Other committees can request the board to reassign physical assets to them.” Not sure about the 3 nerd rule in all circumstances. Perhaps there should be a value threshold that requires board approval for disposal, unless this is covered somewhere else. To be fair, I haven’t looked to see if the 3 nerd rule is officially defined.
30 days after a single meeting where less than 5 people are active isn’t a lot of time to figure out what’s up and work to recruit additional members. I think the grace period should be 60 or 90 days.
I think it needs to be clear to everyone that current areas are considered Standing Committees and removing a current area would require board action. This is at least my understanding, correct me if I’m wrong.
There probably should be a bit saying the board may change a Special Committee into a Standing Committee if it wishes.
Assuming each section in this document applies to Standing Committees, Ad Hoc Committees, and Specialized Committees, equally this does impose a new leadership and operational structure on current areas. However, that doesn’t necessarily have to be onerous, since most current area leads and assistant leads get together to offer a safety class, orientation, or whatnot a time or two a month. They also attend the monthly Area Leads meeting. Any of these times could be opportunities to quickly meet to discuss the business of the area and document it on the wiki.