Meeting agenda is posted for next Thursday.
https://wiki.makeict.org/wiki/May_18th_2023
At a glance:
- Roof discussion, vote, and fundraising
- Updates from the Election Committee
- Guest Policy Update
Meeting agenda is posted for next Thursday.
https://wiki.makeict.org/wiki/May_18th_2023
At a glance:
Here is a link to the existing policy:
https://wiki.makeict.org/wiki/Guest_policy
Here is the suggested Guest policy update:
Approved by Membership Committee on 5/9/2023, to be presented to the Board for the 5/19/2023 meeting.
Purpose:
To clarify the definition of direct supervision.
Policy:
Just a note, the redlines did not come through on this, so it might sound a little confusing. A clean copy without the redline can be found on the minutes of our meeting (May 9, 2023 - Membership - MakeICT Wiki).
If this passes, how will it effect the groups of students we are bringing to the space? If a neighborhood kid comes into the garden or is crossing the property to get to the waterway how are we to address them? Will there be signage put up on the property to let our neighbors know they can no longer walk laps without a member present with them?
The vast majority of the wording is already in place. The neighbors walking on our property already don’t fit into the guest policy….
Directly supervised is a problem. While we don’t currently enforce outdoors this creates the potential in the future for someone to not make nice with the neighborhood. The last event we had with the students the adults stayed in the same room as the project they were leading and the students, many of them under 16 and not current members went round robin from project to project as they completed the task and were ready for the next project not directly supervised. How should that be handled?
This also buggs me, because it’s in direct conflict with a bullet point directly under it. I’m thinking of a way to clarify it with it’s intent.
Both of those are existing policies.
I read the lower bullet point as an exception to the “may not charge” stipulation.
The guest policy makes an exception for officially posted event times.
It’s not in direct conflict. This is talking about members charging guests a fee to enter the makerspace. That’s not allowed. But they can charge a fee to offer a tutoring service once inside the space. The fee would be for the tutoring, not for entrance into MakeICT.
If the wording is confusing, could you suggest something that might work better?
Throwing out some ideas:
That’s what I was thinking about doing.
I know it is last minute, but I did get with the committee, and we revised bullet point 7 to simply it. Proposed verbiage will simply be: